Section 167 Indian Evidence Act 1872

Section 167 Indian Evidence Act 1872 in Hindi and English 

Section 167 Evidence Act 1872 :No new trial for improper admission or rejection of evidence -- The improper admission or rejection of evidence shall not be ground of itself for a new trial or reversal of any decision in any case, if it shall appear to the Court before which such objection is raised that, independently of the evidence objected to and admitted, there was sufficient evidence to justify the decision, or that, if the rejected evidence had been received, it ought not to have varied the decision.

Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 167 Indian Evidence Act 1872:

Sushila Aggarwal vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 29 January, 2020

Narain And Two Others vs The State Of Punjab on 4 December, 1958

Vallabhdas Liladhar And Ors vs Assistant Collector Of Customs on 27 January, 1964

Ramkishan Mithanlal Sharma vs The State Of Bombay.[And Two on 22 October, 1954

Kartar Singh vs State Of Punjab on 11 March, 1994

Collector Of Customs, Madras And vs D. Bhoormul on 3 April, 1974

The State Of Punjab vs Barkat Ram on 30 August, 1961

Badku Joti Savant vs State Of Mysore on 1 March, 1966

Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia Etc vs State Of Punjab on 9 April, 1980

Shamshul Kanwar vs State Of U.P on 4 May, 1995

भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 1872 की धारा 167 का विवरण :  -  साक्ष्य के अनुचित ग्रहण या अग्रहण के लिए नवीन विचारण नहीं होगा -- साक्ष्य का अनुचित ग्रहण या अग्रहण स्वयंमेव किसी भी मामले में नवीन विचारण के लिए या किसी विनिश्चय के उलटे जाने के लिए आधार नहीं होगा, यदि उस न्यायालय को जिसके समक्ष ऐसा आक्षेप उठाया गया है, यह प्रतीत हो कि आक्षिप्त और गृहीत उस साक्ष्य के बिना भी विनिश्चय के न्यायोचित ठहराने के लिए यथेष्ट साक्ष्य था अथवा यह कि यदि अगृहीत साक्ष्य लिया भी गया होता, तो उससे विनिश्चय में फेरफार न होना चाहिए था।

To download this dhara / Section of Indian Evidence Act in pdf format use chrome web browser and use keys [Ctrl + P] and save as pdf.