Posts

Showing posts from February, 2023

SIRAJUDHEEN VERSUS ZEENATH & ORS.

Image
SIRAJUDHEEN  VERSUS ZEENATH & ORS.  Landmark Cases  of India /  सुप्रीम कोर्ट के ऐतिहासिक फैसले 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1491 OF 2023 (ARISING OUT OF SLP(CIVIL) NO. 22557 OF 2019) SIRAJUDHEEN ….APPELLANT(S) VERSUS ZEENATH & ORS. ….RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT DINESH MAHESHWARI, J. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the common judgment and order dated 28.06.2019, passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam insofar as relating to RFA No. 247 of 2014, whereby the appeal filed by the plaintiff (respondent No. 1 herein) against dismissal of her suit for cancellation of a sale deed and for prohibitory injunction was disposed of with directions to the Trial Court to decide the suit afresh after de novo trial, essentially with the observations that the evidence necessary for proper determination of the suit had not been brought on record. 3. In the impugned common judgment and order dated 28.06.2019,

AMAN SEMI-CONDUCTORS (PVT.) LTD. VERSUS HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVLOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ANR

Image
AMAN SEMI-CONDUCTORS (PVT.) LTD. VERSUS HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVLOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ANR  Landmark Cases  of India /  सुप्रीम कोर्ट के ऐतिहासिक फैसले 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 572-573 OF 2010 AMAN SEMI-CONDUCTORS (PVT.) LTD. …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVLOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. & ANR. …RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J. 1. The present appeals, by special leave, are directed against orders1  of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter “NCDRC”). The NCDRC allowed a revision petition filed by the respondent corporation. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellant, a proprietary concern applied for an industrial plot of the proposed project on 28-02-1994 in Industrial State Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon. The respondent corporation (hereinafter “HSIDC”) called the appellant’s proprietor, Modi Lal Gupta, for an interview 1 Dated 11.01.2007 in

Anant Thanur Karmuse Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Image
Anant Thanur Karmuse Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors.  Landmark Cases  of India /  सुप्रीम कोर्ट के ऐतिहासिक फैसले REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2023 Anant Thanur Karmuse …Appellant(s) Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T M.R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dated 26.04.2022 passed in Writ Petition No. 411 of 2021 by which the High Court has dismissed the said writ petition preferred by the appellant herein – the victim seeking transfer of the investigation to Central Bureau of Investigation or to any other agency to investigate / re-investigate the FIR Nos. 119 of 2020 and 120 of 2020 registered at Vartak Nagar Police Station, Thane, the original writ petitioner – the victim has preferred the present appeal. 2. The facts leading to the present appeal and as per the