Indian Constitution

Brij Bhushan And Anr. vs The State Of Delhi - Supreme Court Judgement 1950 Supreme Court of India Brij Bhushan And Anr. vs The State Of Delhi on 2 March, 1950 Equivalent citations: 1950 SuppSCR 245 Author: F Ali Bench: B Mukerjea, M C Mahajan, P Sastri, S Dass, S F Ali JUDGMENT Fazl Ali, J. 1. The question raised in this case relates to the validity of section 7(1) (c) of the East Punjab Public Safety Act, 1949 (as extended to the Province of Delhi), which runs as follows :- "The Provincial Government or any authority authorised by it in this behalf if satisfied that such action is necessary for the purpose of preventing or combating any activity prejudicial to the public safety or the maintenance of public order may, by order in writing addressed to a printer, publisher or editor -       *           *           *          *           *          * (c) require that any matter relating to a particular subject or class or subjects shall before public

Messrs. Khimji Poonja And Company vs Shri Baldev Das C. Parikh - Supreme Court Judgement 1950  Supreme Court of India Messrs. Khimji Poonja And Company vs Shri Baldev Das C. Parikh on 14 March, 1950 Equivalent citations: 1950 AIR, 7 1950 SCR 64 Author: S R Das Bench: Das, Sudhi Ranjan            PETITIONER: MESSRS. KHIMJI POONJA AND COMPANY Vs. RESPONDENT: SHRI BALDEV DAS C. PARIKH DATE OF JUDGMENT: 14/03/1950 BENCH: DAS, SUDHI RANJAN BENCH: DAS, SUDHI RANJAN KANIA, HIRALAL J. (CJ) FAZAL ALI, SAIYID SASTRI, M. PATANJALI MAHAJAN, MEHR CHAND MUKHERJEA, B.K. CITATION:  1950 AIR    7   1950 SCR   64 ACT:    Bombay Cotton Contracts Act (IV of 1932), s. 8  (1)--East India  Cotton  Association Bye-laws, Nos.  51-A,  65-A, 80, 82--Cotton  Contract--Contract note  stating minimum  amount Of   deposit   as   Rs.   25   and    not   in   prescribed form--Validity--Arbitration  and  award under arbitration cla

Supreme Court of India The Bharat Bank Ltd., Delhi vs The Employees Of The Bharat Bank Ltd. on 1 March, 1950 Equivalent citations: 1950 SuppSCR 317 Author: Kania Bench: H Kania, B Mukerjea, M C Mahajan, M P Sastri, S F Ali JUDGMENT Kania, C.J. 1. I have read the judgments prepared by Messrs Fazl Ali, Mahajan and Mukherjea, JJ., in this case. As the views in those judgments in respect of the nature of the duties and functions of the Industrial Tribunal do not show agreement I consider it necessary to add a few words of my own. 2. In my opinion, the functions and duties of the Industrial Tribunal are very much like those of a body discharging judicial functions, although it is not a Court. The rules framed by the Tribunal required evidence to be taken and witnesses to be examined, cross-examined and re-examined. The Act constituting the Tribunal imposes penalties for incorrect statements made before the Tribunal. While the powers of the Industrial Tribunal in some res