Posts

Showing posts from January, 2022

Section 70 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

    Section 70  Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996:  Disclosure of information.—When the conciliator receives factual information concerning the dispute from a party, he shall disclose the substance of that information to the other party in order that the other party may have the opportunity to present any explanation which he considers appropriate: Provided that when a party gives any information to the conciliator subject to a specific condition that it be kept confidential, the conciliator shall not disclose that information to the other party. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Leading Case Law Related to Section 70  Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996:  Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd vs Essar Power Ltd on 13 March, 2008 National Highways Authority Of  vs Sayedabad Tea Co. Ltd. And Ors on 27 August, 2019 Cheran Propertiees Limited vs Kasturi And Sons Limited on 24 April, 2018 Yograj Infras.Ltd vs Ssang Yong Engineering &  on 1 September, 2011 State Of Goa vs M

Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele

Image
Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele - Supreme Court Case 2022 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 463 OF 2022 Divisional Controller Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation ...Appellant(s) Versus Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele ...Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T M.R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 30.01.2020 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Nagpur in LPA No. 37 of 2008 by which the Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the said appeal and has confirmed the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge quashing and setting aside the judgment and order passed by the Industrial Tribunal and restoring the award passed by the Labour Court directing the appellant to reinstate the respondent with back wages, the employer – Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to

National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited vs Montecarlo Limited

Image
National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited vs Montecarlo Limited - Supreme Court Case 2022  REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6466 OF 2021 National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited …Appellant(s) Versus Montecarlo Limited & Anr. …Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T M.R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order dated 23.08.2021 passed by the High Court of Delhi in Writ Petition (C) No. 5127 of 2021 by which the High Court has allowed the said writ petition preferred by the respondent herein – original writ petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the “original writ petitioner”) and has quashed the communications dated 27.04.2021 and 28.04.2021 and the notification dated 28.04.2021 by which the original writ petitioner was informed that its technical Bid has been rejected on the ground that the same is non-responsive and consequently has directed the appellant herein to proceed in accordance w