Posts

K.T.V. HEALTH FOOD PVT. LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

Image
K.T.V. HEALTH FOOD PVT. LTD. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Landmark Cases  of India /  सुप्रीम कोर्ट के ऐतिहासिक फैसले 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3626 OF 2020 K.T.V. HEALTH FOOD PVT. LTD. …APPELLANT (S) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. …RESPONDENT(S) With CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3639 of 2020 K.T.V. OIL MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED …APPELLANT (S) VERSUS THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, UNION OF INDIA & ORS. …RESPONDENT (S) J U D G M E N T K.M. JOSEPH, J. 1. The Appeals are lodged under Section 22 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. C.A. NO. 3626 OF 2020 (THE FIRST APPEAL) 2. The appellant challenges the Order passed by the National Green Tribunal (NGT), Southern Zone. By the impugned Order, the NGT has allowed the appeal filed 2 by Respondent No.5 and set aside proceedings dated 08.03.2019. By the said proceedings, Respondent No.1 had granted ex post facto clearance purporting to invoke paragraph-4.3 of the Notification issued in

B V SESHAIAH VERSUS THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ANR.

Image
BAHARUL ISLAM & ORS.  VERSUS THE INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION AND ORS. REPORTABLE Landmark Cases  of India /  सुप्रीम कोर्ट के ऐतिहासिक फैसले IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2023 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL) NO.7099/2018) B V SESHAIAH ... APPELLANT(S)  VERSUS THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ANR. ... RESPONDENT(S)  WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2023 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL) NO.7100/2018) B VAMSI KRISHNA ... APPELLANT(S)  VERSUS THE STATE OF TELENGANA & ANR. ... RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KRISHNA MURARI, J. Leave Granted. 2. The present Appeals have been filed by the Appellants herein against the impugned order and judgment dated 17.04.2018 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Hyderabad in Criminal Revision Case Nos. 1678/2014 and 1679/2014. 1 3. For the purpose of these Appeals, briefly, the facts of the present case are that on a private complaint initiated by the Respondent No.2, procee

M/S GODREJ SARA LEE LTD. VS. THE EXCISE AND TAXATION OFFICERCUM-ASSESSING AUTHORITY & ORS.

Image
M/S GODREJ SARA LEE LTD. VS. THE EXCISE AND TAXATION OFFICERCUM-ASSESSING AUTHORITY & ORS. 1 REPORTABLE Landmark Cases  of India /  सुप्रीम कोर्ट के ऐतिहासिक फैसले IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5393 OF 2010 M/S GODREJ SARA LEE LTD. ……APPELLANT(S) VS. THE EXCISE AND TAXATION OFFICERCUM-ASSESSING AUTHORITY & ORS. …..RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T DIPANKAR DATTA, J. This appeal, by special leave, registers a challenge to an order dated 12th October, 2009 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh (hereafter ‘the High Court’, for short) dismissing Civil Writ Petition No.9191 of 2009 presented by the appellant and relegating it to the remedy of an appeal under section 33 of the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereafter ‘the VAT Act’, for short). 2. Two questions emerge for decision on this appeal. First, whether the High Court was justified in declining interference on the ground of availability of an alternat