Indian Constitution

BALU SUDAM KHALDE AND ANOTHER  VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA   Landmark Cases  of India /  सुप्रीम कोर्ट के ऐतिहासिक फैसले 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1910 OF 2010 BALU SUDAM KHALDE AND ANOTHER ……APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ......RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: 1. This appeal by special leave is at the instance of two convict persons and is directed against the judgment and order dated 02.03.2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Appeal No. 637 of 2003 by which the High Court dismissed the criminal appeal referred to above, and thereby affirmed the order of conviction and the consequence sentence dated 12.03.2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune dated 12.03.2003 in Sessions Case No. 323 of 2001, by convicting both the appellants herein for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for shor

Shivshankara & Anr.  Versus H.P. Vedavyasa Char  Landmark Cases  of India /  सुप्रीम कोर्ट के ऐतिहासिक फैसले Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.10215 of 2011 Shivshankara & Anr.  …Appellants Versus H.P. Vedavyasa Char  …Respondent J U D G M E N T C.T. RAVIKUMAR, J. 1. The defendant Nos. 1 and 2 in O.S. No.6456 of 1993 on the file of the Court of XIV Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore, filed this appeal under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, calling in question the judgment and decree dated 09.09.2010 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in RFA No.1966 of 2007. They are the sons of the third defendant in the said suit, who died during its pendency. They filed the stated first appeal on being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree dated 04.07.2007 in O.S. No.6456 of 1993. During the pendency of the captioned appeal, the Page 1 of 48 second appellant died and consequently