Indian Constitution

Section 294A IPC in Hindi and English Section 294A of IPC 1860:-Keeping lottery office - Whoever keeps any office or place for the purpose of drawing any lottery not being a State lottery or a lottery authorised by the State Government, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both. And whoever publishes any proposal to pay any sum, or to deliver any goods, or to do or forbear doing anything for the benefit of any person, on any event or contingency relative or applicable to the drawing of any ticket, lot, number or figure in any such lottery, shall be punished with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 294A of Indian Penal Code 1860: H. Anraj And Others Etc vs State Of Maharashtra on 23 January, 1984 B.R. Enterprises Etc, Etc vs State Of U.P. And Grs. Etc: Etc on 7 May, 1999 The State Of Bombay vs R. M. D. Chamarbaug

 Section 294 IPC in Hindi and English Section 294 of IPC 1860:-Obscene acts and songs - Whoever, to the annoyance of others - (a) does any obscene act in any public place, or (b) sings, recites or utters any obscene song, ballad or words, in or near any public place, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months, or with fine, or with both.   Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 294 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 7 May, 1996 Indian Hotel And Restaurant vs The State Of Maharashtra Home on 17 January, 2019 The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Dhruv Gurjar on 22 February, 2019 The State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Kalyan Singh on 4 January, 2019 Japani Sahoo vs Chandra Sekhar Mohanty on 27 July, 2007 State Of Haryana & Anr vs Ved Kaur on 3 May, 2017 Madan Mohan Singh vs State Of Gujarat & Anr on 17 August, 2010 Chander Kala vs Ram Kishan And Anr. on 1 May, 19

 Section 293 IPC in Hindi and English Section 293 of IPC 1860:-Sale, etc., of obscene objects to young person - Whoever sells, lets to hire, distributes, exhibits or circulates to any person under the age of twenty years any such obscene object as is referred to in the last preceding section, or offers or attempts so to do, shall be punished on first conviction with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and with fine which may extend to two thousand rupees, and, in the event of a second or subsequent conviction, with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and also with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 293 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Raj Kapoor And Ors vs State And Others on 26 October, 1979 Devidas Ramachandra Tuljapurkar vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 14 May, 2015 Bachpan Bachao Andolan vs Union Of India &am

 Section 292 IPC in Hindi and English Section 292 of IPC 1860:- Sale, etc., of obscene books, etc. - (1) For the purposes of sub-section (2), a book, pamphlet, paper, writing, drawing, painting, representation, figure or any other object, shall be deemed to be obscene if it is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest or if its effect, or (where it comprises two or more distinct items) the effect of any one of its items, is, if taken as a whole, such as to tend to deprave and corrupt person, who are likely, having regard to all relevant circumstances, to read, see or hear the matter contained or embodied in it. (2) Whoever -  (a) sells, lets to hire, distributes, publicly exhibits or in any manner puts into circulation, or for purposes of sale, hire, distribution, public exhibition or circulation, makes, produces or has in his possession any obscene book, pamphlet, paper, drawing, painting, representation or figure or any other obscene object whatsoever, or (b) imports, exports or

 Section 291 IPC in Hindi and English Section 291 of IPC 1860:- Continuance of nuisance after injunction to discontinue - Whoever repeats or continues a public nuisance, having been enjoined by any public servant who has lawful authority to issue such injunction not to repeat or continue such nuisance, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 291 of Indian Penal Code 1860: In Re: Noise Pollution  vs on 18 July, 2005 In Re: Noise Pollution  vs on 18 July, 2005 In Re: Noise Pollution  vs Unknown on 18 July, 2005 Uma Shankar Singh vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 9 September, 2010 Aveek Sarkar & Anr vs State Of West Bengal And Anr on 3 February, 2014 Aveek Sarkar & Anr vs State Of West Bengal And Anr on 3 February, 1947 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 291 का विवरण - न्यूसेंस बंद करने के व्यादेश के पश्चात् उसका चालू रखना - जो

 Section 290 IPC in Hindi and English Section 290 of IPC 1860:- Punishment for public nuisance in cases not otherwise provided for — Whoever commits a public nuisance in any case not otherwise punishable by this Code, shall be punished with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 290 of Indian Penal Code 1860: In Re: Noise Pollution vs on 18 July, 2005 In Re: Noise Pollution  vs on 18 July, 2005 In Re: Noise Pollution  vs Unknown on 18 July, 2005 Sharanjit Kaur & Anr vs State Of Punjab on 1 July, 2013 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 290 का विवरण - अन्यथा अनुपबंधित मामलों में लोक न्यूसेंस के लिए दण्ड - जो कोई किसी ऐसे मामले में लोक न्यूसेंस करेगा जो इस संहिता द्वारा अन्यथा दण्डनीय नहीं है, वह जुर्माने से, जो दो सौ रुपए तक का हो सकेगा, दण्डित किया जाएगा। To download this dhara of IPC in pdf format use chrome web browser and use keys [Ctrl + P] and save as pdf.

Section 289 IPC in Hindi and English Section 289 of IPC 1860:-Negligent conduct with respect to animal - Whoever knowingly or negligently omits to take such order with any animal in his possession as is sufficient to guard against any probable danger to human life, or any probable danger of grievous hurt from such animal, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 289 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Sharanjit Kaur & Anr vs State Of Punjab on 1 July, 2013 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 289 का विवरण - जीवजन्तु के संबंध में उपेक्षापूर्ण आचरण - जो कोई अपने कब्जे में के किसी जीवजन्तु के संबंध में ऐसी व्यवस्था करने का, जो ऐसे जीव जंतु से मानव जीवन को किसी अधिसंभाव्य संकट या घोर उपहति के किसी अधिसंभाव्य संकट से बचाने के लिए पर्याप्त हो, जानते हुए या उपेक्षापूर्वक लोप करेगा, वह दो

 Section 288 IPC in Hindi and English Section 288 of IPC 1860:- Negligent conduct with respect to pulling down or repairing buildings - Whoever, in pulling down or repairing any building, knowingly or negligently omits to take such order with that building as is sufficient to guard against any probable danger to human life from the fall of that building, or of any part thereof, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 288 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Rajanikant vs State Of Maharashtra on 30 September, 1970 Rajnikant vs State Of Maharashtra on 30 September, 1970 Shriram & Others vs The State Of Bombay on 5 December, 1960 Smt.Om Wati & Anr vs State, Through Delhi Admn. & Ors on 19 March, 2001 Inder Singh Bagga Singh vs State Of Pepsu on 6 August, 1954 Abdul Gani And Ors. vs

 Section 287 IPC in Hindi and English Section 287 of IPC 1860:-Negligent conduct with respect to machinery - Whoever does, with any machinery, any act so rashly or negligently as to endanger human life, or to be likely to cause hurt or injury to any other person, or knowingly or negligently omits to take such order with any machinery in his possession or under his care as is sufficient to guard against any probable danger to human life from such machinery, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 287 of Indian Penal Code 1860: hushan Lal Raina Son Of Shri vs The State Of Jharkhand on 18 November, 2019 Jharkhand High Court  Suren Gurung vs State Of Sikkim on 11 April, 2018 Sikkim High Court  Vijay Parekh vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 May, 2020 Madhya Pradesh High Court  Maya

Section 286 IPC in Hindi and English Section 286 of IPC 1860:-Negligent conduct with respect to explosive substance - Whoever does, with any explosive substance, any act so rashly or negligently as to endanger human life, or to be likely to cause hurt or injury to any other person, or knowingly or negligently omits to take such order with any explosive substance in his possession as is sufficient to guard against any probable danger to human life from that substance, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 286 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Deepak Khinchi vs State Of Rajasthan on 30 April, 2012 Ajay Dixit, N.S.A. vs State Of U.P. And Others on 26 September, 1984 Giani Pratap Singh vs State Of Rajasthan & Anr on 4 September, 1995 Jameel Ahmed & Anr vs State Of Rajasthan on 30 A

 Section 285 IPC in Hindi and English Section 285 of IPC 1860:-Negligent conduct with respect to fire or combustible matter - Whoever does, with fire or any combustible matter, any act so rashly or negligently as to endanger human life, or to be likely to cause hurt or injury to any other person, or knowingly or negligently omits to take such order with any fire or any combustible matter in his possession as is sufficient to guard against any probable danger to human life from such fire or combustible matter, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 285 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Kurban Hussein Mohammedali vs State Of Maharashtra on 15 December, 1964 Deepak Khinchi vs State Of Rajasthan on 30 April, 2012 Bhalchandra Alias Bapu & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 11 April, 1968 Kul

 Section 284 IPC in Hindi and English Section 284 of IPC 1860:-Negligent conduct with respect to poisonous substance - Whoever does, with any poisonous substance, any act in a manner so rash or negligent as to endanger human life, or to be likely to cause hurt or injury to any person, or knowingly or negligently omits to take such order with any poisonous substance in his possession as is sufficient to guard against any probable danger to human life from such poisonous substance, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 284 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Dr. Sachin S/O. Rangrao Chavan vs Chandrashekhar S/O. Namdeorao on 4 October, 2018 Bombay High Court  Ramesh vs State on 5 November, 2020 Rajasthan High Court  Mukesh vs State on 5 November, 2020 Rajasthan High Court  Bheru Lal vs Stat

 Section 283 IPC in Hindi and English Section283 of IPC 1860:-Danger or obstruction in public way or line of navigation - Whoever, by doing any act, or by omitting to take order with any property in his possession or under his charge, causes danger, obstruction or injury to any person in any public way or public line of navigation, shall be punished with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 283 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Zorawar Singh & Anr vs Gurbax Singh Bains & Ors on 4 December, 2014 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 283 का विवरण - लोक मार्ग या नौपरिवहन पथ में संकट या बाधा - जो कोई किसी कार्य को कर के या अपने कब्जे में की, या अपने भार साधन के अधीन किसी, संपत्ति की व्यवस्था करने का लोप करने द्वारा किसी लोक मार्ग या नौपरिवहन के लोक पथ में किसी व्यक्ति को संकट, बाधा या क्षति कारित करेगा, वह जुर्माने से, जो दो सौ रुपए तक का हो सकेगा, दण्डित किया जाएगा। To download this dhara of IPC i

 Section 282 IPC in Hindi and English Section 282 of IPC 1860:- Conveying person by water for hire in unsafe or overloaded vessel - Whoever knowingly or negligently conveys, or causes to be conveyed for hire, any person by water in any vessel, when that vessel is in such a state or so loaded as to endanger the life of that person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 282 of Indian Penal Code 1860: V.R. Bhate And Ors. vs State Of Maharashtra on 13 March, 1970 Sashi Mohan Debnath And Others vs The State Of West Bengal on 19 November, 1957 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 282 का विवरण - अक्षेमकर या अति लदे हुए जलयान में भाड़े के लिए जलमार्ग से किसी व्यक्ति का प्रवहण - जो कोई किसी व्यक्ति को किसी जलयान में जल मार्ग से, जानते हुए या उपेक्षापूर्वक भाड़े पर तब प्रवहण करेगा, या

 Section 281 IPC in Hindi and English Section 281 of IPC 1860:- Exhibition of false light, mark or buoy – Whoever exhibits any false light, mark or buoy, intending or knowing it to be likely that such exhibition will mislead any navigator, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 281 of Indian Penal Code 1860: T. Suthenthiraraja,P vs State By D.S.P., Cbi, Sit, Chennai on 8 October, 1999 State Of Tamil Nadu Through vs Nalini And 25 Others on 11 May, 1999 S. Shanmugadivelu, S. Nalini & vs State By D.S.P., Cbi, Sit, Chennai on 11 May, 1999 Dhanajaya Reddy vs State Of Karnataka on 14 March, 2001 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 281 का विवरण -  भ्रामक,प्रकाश चिन्ह या बोये का प्रदर्शन - जो कोई किसी भ्रामक प्रकाश चिन्ह या बोये का प्रदर्शन इस आशय से, या यह संभाव्य जानते हुए करेगा, कि ऐसा प्रदर्शन किसी नौपरिवाहक को म

 Section 280 IPC in Hindi and English Section 280 of IPC 1860:- Rash navigation of vessel - Whoever navigates any vessel in a manner so rash or negligent as to endanger human life, or to be likely to cause hurt or injury to any other person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 280 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Vijay Hariba Kadam vs Medha Police Station on 9 April, 2010 Bombay High Court  Cc.No.284/2013 Of Judicial First vs By Adv.Sri.P.Venugopal Kerala High Court  Victor Samuel vs State Of Kerala on 20 October, 2009 Kerala High Court  Revision vs By Adv. Sri.C.K.Sajeev on 20 February, 2002 Kerala High Court  Hisa A. Sheng vs Administrator on 29 September, 2006 Kerala High Court  Shiva Ram vs The State on 20 November, 1963 Allahabad High Court  Sanjay Kumar Shandilya & Ors vs

 Section 279 IPC in Hindi and English Section 279 of IPC 1860:-Rash driving or riding on a public way - Whoever drives any vehicle, or rides, on any public way in a manner so rash or negligent as to endanger human life, or to  be likely to cause hurt or injury to any other person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 279 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Iffco Tokio General Insurance vs Pearl Beverages Ltd. on 12 April,Supreme Court of India Cites 46 - Cited by 0 - Full Document Guru Basavaraj @ Benne Settappa vs State Of Karnataka on 29 August, 2012 Puttaswamy vs State Of Karnataka & Anr on 11 December, 2008 Bharat Amratlal Kothari vs Dosukhan Samadkhan Sindhi & Ors on 4 November, 2009 Thangasamy vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 20 February, 2019 Zorawar Singh & Anr vs Gurba

 Section 278 IPC in Hindi and English Section 278 of IPC 1860:- Making atmosphere noxious to health - Whoever voluntarily vitiates the atmosphere in any place so as to make it noxious to the health of persons in general dwelling or carrying on business in the neighbourhood or passing along a public way, shall be punished with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 278 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Common Cause (A Regd. Society) vs Union Of India on 9 March, 2018 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 278 का विवरण - वायुमण्डल को स्वास्थ्य के लिए अपायकर बनाना - जो कोई किसी स्थान के वायुमंडल को स्वेच्छया इस प्रकार दूषित करेगा कि वह जनसाधारण के स्वास्थ्य के लिए जो पड़ोस में निवास या कारबार करते हों, या लोक मार्ग से आते जाते हों, अपायकर बन जाए, वह जुर्माने से, जो पांच सौ रुपए तक का हो सकेगा, दण्डित किया जायेगा To download this dhara of IPC in pdf format use chrome web browser and use keys [Ctrl + P] and sav

 Section 277 IPC in Hindi and English Section 277 of IPC 1860:- Fouling water of public spring or reservoir - Whoever voluntarily corrupts or fouls the water of any public spring or reservoir, so as to render it less fit for the purpose for which it is ordinarily used, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 277 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Sharanjit Kaur & Anr vs State Of Punjab on 1 July, 2013 Khem Chand vs The Union Of India And Others on 13 December, 1957 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 277 का विवरण - लोक जल स्त्रोत या जलाशय का जल कलुषित करना - जो कोई लोक जल-स्त्रोत या जलाशय के जल को स्वेच्छया इस प्रकार भ्रष्ट या कलुषित करेगा कि वह उस प्रयोजन के लिए, जिसके लिए वह मामूली तौर पर उपयोग में आता हो, कम उपयोगी हो जाए, वह दोनों में से किसी भांति के कारावास से, जिसकी अवधि

 Section 276 IPC in Hindi and English Section 276 of IPC 1860:- Sale of drug as a different drug or preparation - Whoever knowingly sells, or offers or exposes for sale, or issues from a dispensary for medicinal purposes, any drug or medical preparation, as a different drug or medical preparation, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 276 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Tulsi Ram vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 October, 1984 Tulsiram vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 October, 1984 Delhi Administration vs Vidya Gupta on 24 April, 2018 Ram Dayal vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 7 October, 1969 Mangaldas Raghavji Ruparel & Anr vs The State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 8 February, 1965 Kartar Singh vs State Of Punjab on 11 March, 1994 Food Inspector, Ernakulam And Anr vs P.S. Sreen

 Section 275 IPC in Hindi and English Section 275 of IPC 1860:- Sale of adulterated drugs - Whoever, knowing any drug or medical preparation to have been adulterated in such a manner as to lessen its efficacy, to change its operation, or to render it noxious, sells the same, or offers or exposes it for sale, or issues it from any dispensary for medicinal purposes as unadulterated, or causes it to be used for medicinal purposes by any person not knowing of the adulteration, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 275 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Kartar Singh vs State Of Punjab on 11 March, 1994 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 275 का विवरण - अपमिश्रित औषधियों का विक्रय - जो कोई यह जानते हुए कि किसी औषधि या भेषजीय निर्मिति में इस प्रकार से अपमिश्रण किया गया है कि उसकी प्रभावका

 Section 274 IPC in Hindi and English Section 274 of IPC 1860:-  Adulteration of drugs - Whoever adulterates any drug or medical preparation in such a manner as to lessen the efficacy or change the operation of such drug or medical preparation, or to make it noxious, intending that it shall be sold or used for, or knowing it to be likely that it will be sold or used for, any medicinal purpose, as if it had not undergone such adulteration, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 274 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Om Prakash & Anr vs Union Of India & Anr on 30 September, 2011 Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 28 October, 2002 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 274 का विवरण -औषधियों का अपमिश्रण - जो कोई किसी औषधि या भेषजीय निर्मिति में अपमिश्रण इस आशय से

 Section 273 IPC in Hindi and English Section 273 of IPC 1860:-  Sale of noxious food or drink - Whoever sells, or offers or exposes for sale, as food or drink, any article which has been rendered or has become noxious, or is in a state unfit for food or drink, knowing or having reason to believe that the same is noxious as food or drink, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 273 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Swami Achyutanand Tirth & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 5 August, 2016 Kartar Singh vs State Of Punjab on 11 March, 1994 Ravindersingh @ Ravi Pavar vs State Of Gujarat on 22 February, 2013 The State Of Maharashtra vs Sayyed Hassan Sayyed Subhan on 20 September, 2018 Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 28 October, 2002 The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Aman Mittal on 4 S

Section 272 IPC in Hindi and English Section 272 of IPC 1860:- Adulteration of food or drink intended for sale - Whoever adulterates any article of food or drink, so as to make such article noxious as food or drink, intending to sell such article as food or drink, or knowing it to be likely that the same will be sold as food or drink, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 272 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Joseph Kurian vs State Of Kerala on 4 October, 1994 Swami Achyutanand Tirth & Ors vs Union Of India & Ors on 5 August, 2016 E.K. Chandrasenan vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 1995 E.K. Chandrasenan vs The State Of Kerala on 17 January, 1995 Rakesh Kapoor vs State Of H.P on 22 November, 2012 Tulsiram vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 October, 1984 Tulsi Ram vs State Of Madhy

 Section 271 IPC in Hindi and English Section 271 of IPC 1860:-Disobedience to quarantine rule - Whoever knowingly disobeys any rule made and promulgated by the Government for putting any vessel into a state of quarantine, or for regulating the intercourse of vessels in a state of quarantine with the shore or with other vessels, or for regulating the intercourse between places where an infectious disease prevails and other places, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 271 of Indian Penal Code 1860:  Bar Council Of India vs A.K. Balaji . on 13 March, 2018 Banwari vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 14 February, 1962 Willie (William) Slaney vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 31 October, 1955 State Of Karnataka vs K.H. Annegowda & Anr on 8 December, 1976 Kammari Brahmiah And Ors vs Public Prosecutor, High Court Of  on 3 Febr

 Section 270 IPC in Hindi and English Section 270 of IPC 1860:-Malignant act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life - Whoever malignantly does any act which is, and which he knows or has reason to believe to be, likely to spread the infection of any disease dangerous to life, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 270 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Sharda vs Dharmpal on 28 March, 2003 Bar Council Of India vs A.K. Balaji . on 13 March, 2018 Mr. 'X' vs Hospital 'Z' on 21 September, 1998 Selvi & Ors vs State Of Karnataka & Anr on 5 May, 2010 Sandhya Rani Debbarma & Ors vs The National Insurance Co. Ltd & on 16 September, 2016 Mr. "X" vs Hospital "Z" on 10 December, 2002 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 270 का विवरण - परिद्वेषपूर्ण कार्य जिससे जीवन के

 Section 269 IPC in Hindi and English Section 269 of IPC 1860:-Negligent act likely to spread infection of disease dangerous to life - Whoever unlawfully or negligently does any act which is, and which he knows or has reason to believe to be, likely to spread the infection of any disease dangerous to life, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 269 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Selvi & Ors vs State Of Karnataka & Anr on 5 May, 2010 Dhirendra Kumar Mandal vs The Superintendent  on 20 April, 1954 Sharda vs Dharmpal on 28 March, 2003 Mr. 'X' vs Hospital 'Z' on 21 September, 1998 State Of Maharashtra vs Devahari Devasingh Pawar & Others on 18 January, 2008 Kapil Deo Shukla vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 14 October, 1957 Gopi Chand vs The Delhi Administration on 20 January, 1959 Mr. "X" v

 Section 268 IPC in Hindi and English Section 268 of IPC 1860:- Public nuisance - A person is guilty of a public nuisance who does any act or is guilty of an illegal omission which causes any common injury, danger or annoyance to the public or to the people in general who dwell or occupy property in the vicinity, or which must necessarily cause injury, obstruction, danger or annoyance to persons who may have occasion to use any public right. A common nuisance is not excused on the ground that it causes some convenience or advantage. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 268 of Indian Penal Code 1860: K. M. Nanavati vs State Of Maharashtra on 24 November, 1961 In Re: Noise Pollution vs on 18 July, 2005 Kachrulal Bhagirath Agrawal & Ors vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 22 September, 2004 Suhelkhan Khudyarkhan & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 15 April, 2009 Rajesh Kumar vs State Th:Govt Of Nct Of Delhi on 28 September, 2011 Su

 Section 267 IPC in Hindi and English Section 267 of IPC 1860:-Making or selling false weight or measure – Whoever makes, sells or disposes of any instrument for weighing, or any weight, or any measure of length or capacity which he knows to be false, in order that the same may be used as true, or knowing that the same is likely to be used as true, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 267 of Indian Penal Code 1860: The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Aman Mittal on 4 September, 2019 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 267 का विवरण - खोटे बाट या माप का बनाना या बेचना - जो कोई तोलने के ऐसे किसी उपकरण या बाट को या लंबाई या धारिता के ऐसे किसी माप को, जिसका खोटा होना वह जानता है, इसलिए कि उसका खरे की तरह उपयोग किया जाए, या यह संभाव्य जानते हुए कि उसका खरे की तरह उपयोग किया जाए, बनाएगा, बेचेगा या व्ययनित करेगा, वह दोनों में स

 Section 266 IPC in Hindi and English Section 266 of IPC 1860:-Being in possession of false weight or measure - Whoever is in possession of any instrument for weighing, or of any weight, or of any measure of length or capacity, which he knows to be false, intending that the same may be fraudulently used, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 266 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Kanumukkala Krishna Murthy vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 23 March, 1964 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 266 का विवरण - खोटे बाट या माप को कब्जे में रखना - जो कोई तोलने के ऐसे किसी उपकरण या बाट को, या लंबाई या धारिता के किसी माप को, जिसका खोटा होना वह जानता है, इस आशय से कब्जे में रखेगा कि उसे कपटपूर्वक उपयोग में लाया जाए वह दोनों में से किसी भांति के कारावास से, जिसकी अवधि एक वर्ष तक की हो सकेगी, या जुर्माने से, या दोनों से, दण्डित किया जाएगा।

Section 265 IPC in Hindi and English Section 265 of IPC 1860:-Fraudulent use of false weight or measure - Whoever fraudulently uses any false weight or false measure of length or capacity, or fraudulently uses any weight or any measure of length or capacity as a different weight or measure from what it is, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 265 of Indian Penal Code 1860: The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Aman Mittal on 4 September, 2019 Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs State Of Maharashtra Th:Cbi on 21 March, 2013 Bikramjit Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 12 October, 2020 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 265 का विवरण - खोटे बाट या माप का कपटपूर्वक उपयोग - जो कोई किसी खोटे बाट का या लंबाई या धारिता के किसी खोटे माप का कपटपूर्वक उपयोग करेगा, या किसी बाट का, या लंबाई या धारिता के किसी माप का या उससे भिन्न बाट या माप के रूप

 Section 264 IPC in Hindi and English Section 264 of IPC 1860:-Fraudulent use of false instrument for weighing - Whoever fraudulently uses any instrument for weighing which he knows to be false, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 264 of Indian Penal Code 1860:  Sharanjit Kaur & Anr vs State Of Punjab on 1 July, 2013 The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Aman Mittal on 4 September, 2019 India Carat Pvt. Ltd vs State Of Karnataka & Anr on 15 February, 1989 Khushwinder Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 5 March, 2019 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 264 का विवरण - तोलने के लिए खोटे उपकरणों का कपटपूर्वक उपयोग - जो कोई तोलने के लिए ऐसे किसी उपकरण का, जिसका खोटा होना वह जानता है, कपटपूर्वक उपयोग करेगा, वह दोनों में से किसी भांति के कारावास से, जिसकी अवधि एक वर्ष तक की हो सकेगी, या जुर्माने से, या दोनों से, दण्डित किया

 Section 263A IPC in Hindi and English Section 263A of IPC 1860:-Prohibition of fictitious stamps - (1) Whoever - (a) makes, knowingly utters, deals in or sells any fictitious stamp, or knowingly uses for any postal purpose any fictitious stamp, or (b) has in his possession, without lawful excuse, any fictitious stamp, or (c) makes or, without lawful excuse, has in his possession any die, plate, instrument or materials for making any fictitious stamp, shall be punished with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees. (2) Any such stamps, die, plate, instrument or materials in the possession of any person for making any fictitious stamp may be seized and, if seized shall be forfeited. (3) In this section “fictitious stamp” means any stamp falsely purporting to be issued by the Government for the purpose of denoting a rate of postage, or any facsimile or imitation or representation, whether on paper or otherwise, of any stamp issued by Government for that purpose. (4) In this section an

 Section 263 IPC in Hindi and English Section 263 of IPC 1860:-Erasure of mark denoting that stamp has been used - Whoever, fraudulently or with intent to cause loss to Government, erases or removes from a stamp issued by the Government for the purpose of revenue, any mark, put or impressed upon such stamp for the purpose of denoting that the same has been used, or knowingly has in his possession or sells or disposes of any such stamp from which such mark has been erased or removed, or sells or disposes of any such stamp which he knows to have been used, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 263 of Indian Penal Code 1860: State Of U.P vs Suresh Chandra Srivastava & Ors on 3 May, 1984 Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs State Of Maharashtra Th:Cbi on 21 March, 2013 Willie (William) Slaney vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 3

 Section 262 IPC in Hindi and English Section 262 of IPC 1860:- Using Government stamp known to have been before used - Whoever, fraudulently or with intent to cause loss to the Government, uses for any purpose a stamp issued by Government for the purpose of revenue, which he knows to have been before used, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 262 of Indian Penal Code 1860: State Of U.P vs Suresh Chandra Srivastava & Ors on 3 May, 1984 Yakub Abdul Razak Memon vs State Of Maharashtra Th:Cbi on 21 March, 2013 Bikramjit Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 12 October, 2020 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 262 का विवरण - ऐसे सरकारी स्टाम्प का उपयोग जिसके बारे में ज्ञात है कि उसका पहले उपयोग हो चुका है - जो कोई कपटपूर्वक या इस आशय से कि सरकार को हानि कारित की जाए, सरकार द्वारा राजस्व के प्रयोजन के लिए प्रचालित किसी

 Section 261 IPC in Hindi and English Section 261 of IPC 1860:-Effacing, writing from substance bearing Government stamp, or removing from document a stamp used for it, with intent to cause loss to Government - Whoever, fraudulently or with intent to cause loss to the Government, removes or effaces from any substance, bearing any stamp issued by Government for the purpose of revenue, any writing or document for which such stamp has been used, or removes from any writing or document a stamp which has been used for such writing or document, in order that such stamp may be used for a different writing or document, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 261 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Sita Ram vs The State Of Rajasthan on 29 April, 1975 Common Cause (A Regd. Society) vs Union Of India on 9 March, 2018 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय

 Section 260 IPC in Hindi and English Section 260 of IPC 1860:-Using as genuine a Government stamp known to be counterfeit - Whoever uses as genuine any stamp, knowing it to be counterfeit of any stamp issued by Government for the purpose of revenue, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 260 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Pawan Kumar vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 7 May, 1996 Krishnamoorthy vs Sivakumar & Ors on 21 January, 2015 Jaya Simha vs State Of Karnataka on 21 September, 2007 Nanjappa vs Union Of India on 17 April, 2007 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 260 का विवरण - किसी सरकारी स्टाम्प को, कूटकृत जानते हुए उसे असली स्टाम्प के रूप में उपयोग में लाना - जो कोई किसी ऐसे स्टाम्प को, जिसे वह जानता है कि वह सरकार द्वारा राजस्व के प्रयोजन के लिए प्रचालित स्टाम्प की कूटकृति है, असली स्टाम्प के रूप में उपयोग मे

 Section 259 IPC in Hindi and English Section 259 of IPC 1860:-Having possession of counterfeit Government stamp - Whoever has in his possession any stamp which he knows to be a counterfeit of any stamp issued by Government for the purpose of revenue, intending to use, or dispose of the same as a genuine stamp, or in order that it may be used as a genuine stamp, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 259 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Rashida Kamaluddin Syed & Anr vs Shaikh Saheblal Mardan on 2 March, 2007 Joti Parshad vs State Of Haryana on 20 October, 1992 Joty Prashad vs State Of Haryana on 2 November, 1992 Chelloor Mankkal Narayan vs State Of Travancore-Cochin on 10 November, 1952 Chenna Boyanna Krishna Yadav vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 8 December, 2006 Ram Chander And Ors vs State Of Haryana on 1

 Section 258 IPC in Hindi and English Section 258 of IPC 1860:-Sale of counterfeit Government stamp – Whoever, sells, or offers for sale, any stamp which he knows or has reason to believe to be a counterfeit of any stamp issued by Government for the purpose of revenue, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 258 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Renuka vs State Of Karnataka & Anr on 18 February, 2009 Joti Parshad vs State Of Haryana on 20 October, 1992 Harihar Chakravarty vs The State Of West Bengal on 22 October, 1953 Joty Prashad vs State Of Haryana on 2 November, 1992 Ramekbal Tiwary vs Madan Mohan Tiwary & Anr on 17 January, 1967 Chenna Boyanna Krishna Yadav vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 8 December, 2006 Jaya Simha vs State Of Karnataka on 21 September, 2007 Nanjappa vs Union Of India on 17 April, 2007

 Section 257 IPC in Hindi and English Section 257 of IPC 1860:-Making or selling instrument for counterfeiting Government stamp - Whoever makes or performs any part of the process of making, or buys, or sells, or disposes of, any instrument for the purpose of being used, or knowing or having reason to believe that it is intended to be used, for the purpose of counterfeiting any stamp issued by Government for the purpose of revenue, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 257 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Y.P. Baiju vs State Of Kerala And Ors. on 30 October, 2007 S.Ramaswamy vs State Rep. By on 5 November, 2001 S. Ramaswamy, T.S. Kandasamy, vs State Rep. By Deputy on 5 November, 2001 S.Ramaswamy vs State Rep. By on 5 November, 2001 Parbhu vs Emperor on 29 July, 1929 Dinesh vs State & Anr on 8 September, 201 Devida

Section 256 IPC in Hindi and English Section 256 of IPC 1860:-Having possession of instrument or material for counterfeiting Government stamp - Whoever has in his possession any instrument or material for the purpose of being used, or knowing or having reason to believe that it is intended to be used, for the purpose of counterfeiting any stamp issued by Government for the purpose of revenue, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine.   Sidheswar Ganguly vs The State Of West Bengal on 24 October, 1957 Chenna Boyanna Krishna Yadav vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 8 December, 2006 Shri Balasaheb K. Thackeray & Anr vs Shri Venkat @ Babru S/O Wamanrao on 5 July, 2006 Rashida Kamaluddin Syed & Anr vs Shaikh Saheblal Mardan on 2 March, 2007 Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 256 of Indian Penal Code 1860: आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा

 Section 255 IPC in Hindi and English Section 255 of IPC 1860:- Counterfeiting Government stamp - Whoever counterfeits, or knowingly performs any part of the process of counterfeiting, any stamp issued by Government for the purpose of revenue, shall be punished with imprisonment for life or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. Explanation - A person commits this offence who counterfeits by causing a genuine stamp of one denomination to appear like a genuine stamp of a different denomination.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 255 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Chenna Boyanna Krishna Yadav vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 8 December, 2006 Kammari Brahmiah And Ors vs Public Prosecutor, High Court Of on 3 February, 1999 Keki Hormusji Gharda & Ors vs Mehervan Rustom Irani & Anr on 13 May, 2009 Joti Parshad vs State Of Haryana on 20 October, 1992 Jaya Simha vs

 Section 254 IPC in Hindi and English Section 254 of IPC 1860:- Delivery of coin as genuine, which, when first possessed, the deliverer did not know to be altered – Whoever delivers to any other person as genuine or as a coin of a different description from what it is, or attempts to induce any person to receive as genuine,  or as a different coin from what it is, any coin in respect of which he knows that any such operation as that mentioned in section 246, 247, 248 or 249 has been performed, but in respect of which he did not, at the time when he took it into his possession, know that such operation had been performed, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine to an amount which may extend to ten times the value of the coin for which the altered coin is passed, or attempted to be passed.   Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 254 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Gopi Chand vs Th

 Section 253 IPC in Hindi and English Section 253 of IPC 1860:-Possession of Indian coin by person who knew it to be altered when he became possessed thereof - Whoever, fraudulently or with intent that fraud may be committed, is in possession of coin with respect to which the offence defined in either of the section 247 or 249 has been committed, having known at the time of becoming possessed thereof, that such offence had been committed with respect to such coin, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, and shall also be liable to fine.   Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 253 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Cricket Association Of Bengal & vs State Of West Bengal & Ors on 24 March, 1971 Smt. Kaushalya Devi vs Shri Mool, Raj And Others on 4 September, 1963 Chhadami Lal Jain And Others vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 14 September, 1959 Saibal Kumar Gupta And Others vs B. K. Sen An

 Section 252 IPC in Hindi and English Section 252 of IPC 1860:-Possession of coin by person who knew it to be altered when he became possessed thereof - Whoever, fraudulently or with intent that fraud may be committed, is in possession of coin with respect to which the offence defined in either of the section 246 or 248 has been committed, having known at the time of becoming possessed thereof that such offence had been committed with respect to such coin, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine.   Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 252 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Bank Of New York Mellon London vs Zenith Infotech Limited on 21 February, 2017 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 252 का विवरण -  ऐसे व्यक्ति द्वारा सिक्के पर कब्जा जो उसका परिवर्तित होना उस समय जानता था जब वह उसके कब्जे में आया - जो कोई कपटपूर्वक, या इस आशय से कि कपट किया जाए, ऐसे सि

Section  251 IPC in Hindi and English Section  251 of IPC 1860:-Delivery of Indian coin, possessed with knowledge that it is altered - Whoever, having coin in his possession with respect to which the offence defined in section 247 or 249 has been committed, and having known at the time when he became possessed of such coin that such offence had been committed with respect to it, fraudulently or with intent that fraud may be committed, delivers such coin to any other person, or attempts to induce any other person to receive the same, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.   Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section  251 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Sewakram Sobhani vs R.K. Karanjia, Chief Editor, on 1 May, 1981 Anna Reddy Sambasiva Reddy & Ors vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 21 April, 2009 Bhushan Kumar & Anr vs State(Nct Of Delhi) & Anr on 4 April,