Posts

Showing posts from June, 2021

क्या है महिला अधिकार?

 क्या है महिला अधिकार? देशभर में नारी उत्थान ( महिला अधिकार) की बात बड़े ही जोर_ शोर से उठाई जा रही है | लेकिन देश की अधिकांश महिलाओं को सही मायनों में उनके मौलिक अधिकार अथवा संवैधानिक अधिकार की जानकारी ना के बराबर है | आइए जानते हैं कि भारतीय संविधान के अनुसार भारतीय महिलाओं को क्या-क्या हक प्रदान किए गए हैं | प्रत्येक नागरिक को समानता, इसमें किसी प्रकार का लिंग भेद नहीं है | समानता स्वतंत्रता और न्याय का अधिकार महिला पुरुष दोनों को समान रूप से दिया गया है | शारीरिक और मानसिक तौर पर नर नारी में किसी प्रकार का भेदभाव असैंवैधानिक माना गया है | हाल की आवश्यकता महसूस होने पर महिलाओं और पुरुषों का वर्गीकरण किया जा सकता है अनुच्छेद -15 में यह प्रावधान किया गया है कि स्वतंत्रता समानता /और न्याय के साथ-साथ महिलाओं/ लड़कीयो की सुरक्षा और संरक्षण का काम भी सरकार का कर्तव्य है | जैसे बिहार में लड़कियों के लिए साइकिल और पोषक की योजना मध्यप्रदेश में लड़कियों के लिए लाडली लक्ष्मी योजना दिल्ली में मेट्रो में महिलाओं के लिए रिजर्व कोच की व्यवस्था आदि | स्वतंत्रता और समानता का अधिकार_ अनुच्छेद_ 19 में

बाल अधिकार

 बाल अधिकार यह सत्य है कि भारत के बच्चों में से बहुत से बच्चे ऐसी आर्थिक एवं मानसिक वातावरण में रहते हैं जो उनके शारीरिक एवं मानसिक विकास में बाधा पहुंचाते हैं | आज समय की जरूरत है कि हम भारत में इन बच्चों की आवश्यकताओं को पूरा करने के लिए तैयार हो जाएं ताकि उनके भविष्य को उज्जवल व सशक्त बनाया जा सके | भारत में  ,स्वतंत्रयोतर युग ने संवैधानिक उपलब्धियां ,नीतियां कार्यक्रम एवं विधान के माध्यम से बच्चों के प्रति सरकार के स्पष्ट रूप का अनुभव किया है | इस शताब्दी के प्रथम दर्शक में स्वास्थ्य पोषण शिक्षा एवं संबंधित कार्य क्षेत्रों में आए तव्र प्रौद्योगिक विकास ने बच्चों को नए अवसर प्रदान किए हैं | भारत में बच्चों से संबंधित अन्य समस्याओं का प्राथमिकता से विचार करने के उद्देश्य से सरकारी गैर  _सरकारी समस्याएं. ( एनजीओ) एवं अन्य सभी एकजुट हो गए हैं | उनमें समाविष्ट संबंधित मुद्दे हैं  _बच्चे और काम' बाल श्रम की समस्या से निपटा ना लिंग भेद उन्मूलन 'फुटपाथ पर रहने वाले बच्चों का उत्थान विक  लोग बच्चों की विशेष आवश्यकता को पूरा करना एवं हर बच्चों को उसके आधारभूत अधिकार के रूप में शिक्षा

Section 511 IPC in Hindi and English

 Section 511 IPC in Hindi and English Section 511 of IPC 1860:-  Punishment for attempting to commit offences punishable with imprisonment for life other imprisonment. - Whoever, attempts to commit an offence punishable by this Code with imprisonment for life or imprisonment, or to cause such an offence to be committed, and in such attempt does any act towards the commission of the offence, shall, where no express provision is made by this Code for the punishment of such attempt, be punished with imprisonment for any description provided for the offence. for a term which may extend to one half of the imprisonment for life or, as the case may be, one-half of the longest term of imprisonment provided for that offence, or with such fine as is provided for the offence, or with both. Illustration - (a) A makes an attempt to steal some jewels by breaking open a box, and finds after so opening the box, that there is no jewel in it. He has done an act towards the commission of theft, and there

Section 510 IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 510 IPC in Hindi and English Section 510 of IPC 1860:- Misconduct in public by a drunken person. - Whoever, in a state of intoxication, appears in any public place, or in any place which it is a trespass in him to enter, and there conducts himself in such a manner as to cause annoyance to any person, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to twenty-four hours, or with fine which may extend to ten rupees, or with both.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 510 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Sharanjit Kaur & Anr vs State Of Punjab on 1 July, 2013 Shreya Singhal vs U.O.I on 24 March, 2015 M/S. Innoventive Industries Ltd vs Icici Bank on 31 August, 2017 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 510 का विवरण -  मत्त व्यक्ति द्वारा लोक स्थान में अवचार - जो कोई मत्तता की हालत में किसी लोक स्थान में, या किसी ऐसे स्थान में, जिसमे उसका प्रवेश करना अतिचार हो, आएगा और वहाँ इस प्रकार का आचरण करेगा जिससे किसी व्यक्ति को क

Section 509 IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 509 IPC in Hindi and English Section 509 of IPC 1860:-Word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman - Whoever, intending to insult the modesty of any woman, utters any word, makes any sound or gesture, or exhibits any object, intending that such word or sound shall be heard, or that such gesture or object shall be seen, by such woman, or intrudes upon the privacy of such woman, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.   Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 509 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Kanwar Pal Singh Gill vs State (Admn., U.T. Chandigarh) on 27 July, 2005 Mrs. Rupan Deol Bajaj & Anr vs Kanwar Pal Singh Gill & Anr on 12 October, 1995 Dy.Inspector Gen.Of Police & Anr vs S.Samuthiram on 30 November, 2012 Ude Singh vs The State Of Haryana on 25 July, 2019 In Re vs Indian Woman Says Gang-Raped On  on 28 March, 2014 In Re vs Indian Woman Says

Section 508 IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 508 IPC in Hindi and English Section 508 of IPC 1860:-  Act caused by inducing person to believe that he will be rendered an object to the Divine displeasure. - Whoever voluntarily causes or attempts to cause any person to do anything which that person is not legally bound to do, or to omit to do anything which he is legally entitled to do, by inducing or attempting to induce that person to believe that he or any person in whom he is interested will become or will be rendered by some act of the offender an object of Divine displeasure if he does not do the thing which it is the object of the offender lo cause him to do or if he does the thing which it is the object of the offender to cause him to omit shall be punished with imprisonment of either description tor a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both. illustrations  (a) A sits dharna at Z’s door with the intention of causing it to be believed that, by so sitting, he renders Z an object of Divine displ

Section 507 IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 507 IPC in Hindi and English Section 507 of IPC 1860:-Criminal intimidation by an anonymous communication. - Whoever commits the offence of criminal intimidation by an anonymous communication, or having taken precaution to conceal the name or abode of the person from whom the threat comes, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, in addition to the punishment provided for the offence by the last preceding section.   Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 507 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Jai Shree Yadav vs State Of U.P on 12 August, 2004 Shashidhar Purandhar Hegde And vs State Of Karnataka on 15 October, 2004 Ahmed Noormohmed Bhatti vs State Of Gujarat And Ors on 16 March, 2005 Gambhirsinh R.Dekare vs Falgunbhai Chimanbhai Patel & Anr on 11 March, 2013 Ram Tawakya Singh vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 19 August, 2013 Moijullah @ Puttan vs State Of Rajasthan on 19 December, 2003 Moij

Section 506 IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 506 IPC in Hindi and English Section 506 of IPC 1860:-  Punishment for criminal intimidation. - Whoever commits the offence of criminal intimidation shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both; If threat be to cause death, or grievous hurt, etc.- And if the threat be to cause death or grievous hurt, or to cause the destruction of any property by fire, or to cause an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, or to impute unchastity lo a woman, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 506 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Vikram Johar vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 26 April, 2019 Dr. Monica Kumar & Anr vs State Of U. P. & Ors on 27 May, 2008 Karipi Rasheed

Section 505 IPC in Hindi and English

 Section 505 IPC in Hindi and English Section 505 of IPC 1860:- Statements conducing to public mischief. - (1) Whoever makes, publishes or circulates any statement, rumour or report,- (a) with intent to cause, or which is likely to cause, any officer, soldier, sailor or airman in the Army, Navy or Air Force of India to mutiny or otherwise disregard or fail in his duty as such; or (b) with intent to cause, or which is likely to cause, fear or alarm to the public, or to any section of the public whereby any person may be induced to commit an offence against the State or against the public tranquility; or (c) with intent to incite, or which is likely to incite, any class or community of persons to commit any offence against any other class or community, shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. (2) Statements creating or promoting enmity, hatred or ill-will between classes - Whoever makes, publishes or circulates any statement or repo

Section 504 IPC in Hindi and English

Section 504 IPC in Hindi and English Section 504 of IPC 1860:- Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace - Whoever intentionally insults, and thereby gives provocation to any person, intending or knowing it to be likely that such provocation will cause him to break the public peace, or to commit any other offence, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 504 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Vikram Johar vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 26 April, 2019 Fiona Shrikhande vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 22 August, 2013 Bhimanna vs State Of Karnataka on 4 September, 2012 Dr. Monica Kumar & Anr vs State Of U. P. & Ors on 27 May, 2008 Naresh vs The State Of Uttarakhand on 25 April, 2018 Rashmi Chopra vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 30 April, 2019 Ishwar Pratap Singh vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh Home on 28

Section 503 IPC in Hindi and English

Section 503 IPC in Hindi and English Section 503 of IPC 1860:-  Criminal intimidation - Whoever threatens another with any injury to his person, reputation or property, or to the person or reputation of any one in whom that person is interested, with intent to cause alarm to that person, or to cause that person to do any act which he is not legally bound to do, or to omit to do any act which that person is legally entitled to do, as the means of avoiding the execution of such threat, commits criminal intimidation. Explanation - A threat to injure the reputation of any deceased person in whom the person threatened is interested, is within this section. Illustration - A for the purpose of inducing B to desist from prosecuting a civil suit, threatens to burn B's house. A is guilty of criminal intimidation. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 503 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Vikram Johar vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 26 April, 2019 Srinivas Gundl

Section 502 IPC in Hindi and English

Section 502 IPC in Hindi and English Section 502 of IPC 1860:- Sale of printed or engraved substance containing defamatory matter - Whoever sells or offers for sale any printed or engraved substance containing defamatory matter, knowing that it contains such matter, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 502 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Rajdeep Sardesai vs State Of A.P.& Ors on 14 May, 2015 Mohammed Abdulla Khan vs Prakash K. on 4 December, 2017 Bakhshish Singh Brar vs Smt. Gurmej Kaur And Anr on 12 October, 1987 State Of Andhra Pradesh vs Gangula Satya Murthy on 19 November, 1996 Dr. Monica Kumar & Anr vs State Of U. P. & Ors on 27 May, 2008 S. Khushboo vs Kanniammal & Anr on 28 April, 2010 G. Narasimhan & Ors. Etc vs T. V. Chokkappa(Will Connected on 4 September, 1972 Om Prakash & Ors vs State Of Jharkhand & An

Section 501 IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 501 IPC in Hindi and English Section 501 of IPC 1860:-Printing or engraving matter known to be defamatory - Whoever prints or engraves any matter, knowing or having good reason to believe that such matter is defamatory of any person, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.   Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 501 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Mohammed Abdulla Khan vs Prakash K. on 4 December, 2017 Rajdeep Sardesai vs State Of A.P.& Ors on 14 May, 2015 Vinod Dua vs Union Of India on 3 June, 2021 Dr. Jatish Chandra Ghosh vs Hari Sadhan Mukherjee And Others on 16 January, 1961 Sewakram Sobhani vs R.K. Karanjia, Chief Editor, on 1 May, 1981 S. Khushboo vs Kanniammal & Anr on 28 April, 2010 G. Narasimhan & Ors. Etc vs T. V. Chokkappa(Will Connected  on 4 September, 1972 S. Khushboo vs Kanniammal & Anr on 28 April, 2010 Gambhirsinh R.Dekare vs Falgunbhai Chi

Section 500 IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 500 IPC in Hindi and English Section 500 of IPC 1860:- Punishment for defamation - Whoever defames another shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 500 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Basir-Ul-Huq And Others vs The State Of West  on 10 April, 1953 Sahib Singh Mehra vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 22 January, 1965 Surinder Mohan Vikal vs Ascharaj Lal Chopra on 28 February, 1978 Abdul Rehman & Ors vs K.M.Anees-Ul-Haq on 14 November, 2011 Google India Private Ltd vs M/S. Visakha Industries on 10 December, 2019 K.K. Mishra vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 April, 2018 Abdul Rehman Mahomed Yusuf vs Mahomed Haji Ahmad Agbotwalaand on 15 September, 1959 Shatrughna Prasad Sinha vs Rajbhau Surajmal Rathi & Ors on 10 September, 1996 Sewakram Sobhani vs R.K. Karanjia, Chief Editor,  on 1 May, 1981 Rasiklal vs Kishore on 20 February, 2009

Section 499 IPC in Hindi and English

 Section 499 IPC in Hindi and English Section 499 of IPC 1860:-  Defamation - Whoever, by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases hereinafter expected, to defame that person. Explanation 1 - It may amount to defamation to impute anything to a deceased person, if the imputation would harm the reputation of that person if living, and is intended to be hurtful to the feelings of his family or other near relatives. Explanation 2 - It may amount to defamation to make an imputation concerning a company or an association or collection of persons as such. Explanation 3 - An imputation in the form of an alternative or expressed ironically, may amount to defamation. Explanation 4 - No imputation is said to harm a person's reputation, unless th

Section 498A IPC in Hindi and English

Section 498A IPC in Hindi and English Section Section 498 IPC in Hindi and English of IPC 1860:-  Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty - Whoever, being the husband or the relative of the husband of a woman, subjects such woman to cruelty shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to fine. Explanation -- For the purpose of this section, "cruelty" means - (a) any wilful conduct which is of such a nature as is likely to drive the woman to commit suicide or to cause grave injury or danger to life, limb or health (whether mental or physical) of the woman; or (b) harassment of the woman where such harassment is with a view to coercing her or any person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any property or valuable security or is on account of failure by her or any person related to her to meet such demand. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 49

Section 498 IPC in Hindi and English

 Section 498 IPC in Hindi and English Section 498 of IPC 1860:- Enticing or taking away or detaining with criminal intent a married woman - Whoever takes or entices away any woman who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of any other man, from that man, or from any person having the care of her on behalf of that man, with intent that she may have illicit intercourse with any person, or conceals or detains with that intent any such woman, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 498 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Alamgir & Another vs The State Of Bihar on 14 November, 1958 Athul Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 18 August, 2017 Kashmira Devi vs The State Of Uttarakhand on 28 January, 2020 Joseph Shine vs Union Of India on 27 September, 2018 Babu Ram And Others vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 1 February, 1983 S.

Section 497 IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 497 IPC in Hindi and English Section 497 of IPC 1860:- Adultery - Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of another man, without the consent or connivance of that man, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, is guilty of the offence of adultery, and shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both. In such case the wife shall not be punishable as an abettor.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 497 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Joseph Shine vs Union Of India on 27 September, 2018 Smt. Sowmithri Vishnu vs Union Of India & Anr on 27 May, 1985 Saibal Kumar Gupta And Others vs B. K. Sen And Another on 13 January, 1961 Athul Rao vs State Of Karnataka on 18 August, 2017 Yusuf Abdul Aziz vs The State Of Bombay on 10 March, 1954 V. Revathi vs Union Of India & Ors on 25 Fe

Section 496 IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 496 IPC in Hindi and English Section 496 of IPC 1860:-   Marriage ceremony was fraudulently gone through without lawful marriage - Whoever, dishonestly or with a fraudulent intention, goes through the ceremony of being married, knowing that he is not thereby lawfully married, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 496 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Rashida Kamaluddin Syed & Anr vs Shaikh Saheblal Mardan on 2 March, 2007 Mrs. Dhanalakshmi vs R. Prasanna Kumar And Ors on 15 November, 1989 State Of Gujarat & Ors vs Lal Singh Kishan Singh on 12 August, 1980 Shri Bodhisattwa Gautam vs Miss Subhra Chakraborty on 15 December, 1995 Rajiv Thapar & Ors vs Madan Lal Kapoor on 23 January, 2013 Ashwin Nanubhai Vyas vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 10 October, 1966 Ushaben vs Kishorbhai Chunilal Talpada &

Section 495 IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 495 IPC in Hindi and English Section 495 of IPC 1860:- Same offence with concealment of former marriage from person with whom subsequent marriage is contracted - Whoever commits the offence defined in the last preceding section having concealed from the person with whom the subsequent marriage is contracted, the fact of the former marriage, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 495 of Indian Penal Code 1860: A.Subash Babu vs State Of A.P.& Anr on 21 July, 2011 Lily Thomas, Etc. Etc. vs Union Of India & Ors. on 5 April, 2000 Lily Thomas, Etc. Etc vs Union Of India & Ors on 5 May, 2000 Rashida Kamaluddin Syed & Anr vs Shaikh Saheblal Mardan on 2 March, 2007 Gopal Lal vs State Of Rajasthan on 30 January, 1979 Joseph Shine vs Union Of India on 27 September, 2018 Deoki Panjhiyara vs Shahshi Bhush

Section 494 IPC in Hindi and English

 Section 494 IPC in Hindi and English Section 494 of IPC 1860:- Marrying again during lifetime of husband or wife - Whoever, having a husband or wife living, marries in any case in which such marriage is void by reason of its taking place during the life of such husband or wife, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Exception - This section does not extend to any person whose marriage with such husband or wife has been declared void by a Court of competent jurisdiction,  nor to any person who contracts a marriage during the life of a former husband or wife, if such husband or wife, at the time of the subsequent marriage, shall have been continually absent from such person for the space of seven years, and shall not have been heard of by such person as being alive within that time provided the person contracting such subsequent marriage shall, before such marriage takes place, inform the pe

Section 493 IPC in Hindi and English

   Section 493 IPC in Hindi and English Section 493 of IPC 1860:-  Cohabitation caused by a man deceitfully inducing a belief of lawful marriage - Every man who by deceit causes any woman who is not lawfully married to him to believe that she is lawfully married to him and to cohabit or have sexual intercourse with him in that belief, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 493 of Indian Penal Code 1860: State Of Jharkhand vs Ram Chandr on 9 November, 2012 Ram Chandra Bhagat vs State Of Jharkhand on 24 November, 2010 Arun Singh vs State Of U.P. on 10 February, 2020 Ravinder Kaur vs Anil Kumar on 9 April, 2015 Rashida Kamaluddin Syed & Anr vs Shaikh Saheblal Mardan on 2 March, 2007 Ms. X vs The State Of Telangana on 17 May, 2018 Ashwin Nanubhai Vyas vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 10 October, 1966 Shri Bodhisat

Section 492 IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 492 IPC in Hindi and English Section 492 of IPC 1860:-  Breach of contract to serve at distant place to which servant is conveyed at master's expense - Rep. by the Workmen's Breach of Contract (Repealing) Act, 1925 (3 of 1925), sec. 2 and Sch. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 492 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Mukul Dalal Etc. Etc vs Union Of India & Ors. Etc. Etc on 4 May, 1988 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 492 का विवरण -  दूर वाले स्थान पर सेवा करने का संविदा भंग जहां सेवक को मालिक के खर्चे पर ले जाया जाता है - कर्मकार संविदा भंग (निरसन) अधिनियम, 1925 (1925 का 3) की धारा 2 और अनुसूची द्वारा निरसित । To download this dhara of IPC in pdf format use chrome web browser and use keys [Ctrl + P] and save as pdf.

Section 491 IPC in Hindi and English

 Section 491 IPC in Hindi and English Section 491 of IPC 1860:-  Breach of contract to attend on and supply wants of helpless person - Whoever, being bound by a lawful contract to attend on or to supply the wants of any person who, by reason of youth, or of unsoundness of mind, or of a disease or bodily weakness, is helpless or incapable of providing for his own safety or of supplying his own wants, voluntarily omits so to do, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three months, or with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 489A491 G. V. Ramanaiah vs The Superintendent Of Central on 10 October, 1973 Lachmandas Kewalram Ahujaand vs The State Of Bombay on 20 May, 1952 Ranjit Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 21 April, 1959 Kesho Ram vs Delhi Administration on 3 April, 1974 Divine Retreat Centre vs State Of Kerala & Ors on 11 March, 2008 आईपीस

Section 490 IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 490 IPC in Hindi and English Section 490 of IPC 1860:-  Breach of contract of service during voyage or journey - Rep. by the Workmen's Breach of Contract (Repealing) Act, 1925 (3 of 1925), sec. 2 and Sch. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 490 of Indian Penal Code 1860: S.Kanakaraj vs S.Ramalingam on 7 March, 2018 Madras High Court  Smt. Asha Agrawal And 3 Other vs State Of U.P And Another on 18 July, 2019 Allahabad High Court  Prasanna Kumar vs Dhanalaxmi And Ors. on 16 February, 1988 Madras High Court  A.Venugopal vs State Rep. By The Inspector Of on 19 December, 2019 Madras High Court  K.Thimmarayappa vs The State Rep. By Inspector Of  on 27 April, 2017 Madras High Court  Sri Yella Reddy vs Smt Rathnamma W/O H Gurumurthy  on 22 October, 2009 Karnataka High Court  Gautam Datta And Another vs State Of U.P. And Another on 28 June, 2010 Allahabad High Court  Kashi Nath Choudhary vs The State Of Bihar And Ors. on 10 April, 2007 Patna

Section 489E IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 489E IPC in Hindi and English Section 489E of IPC 1860:- Making or using documents resembling currency-notes or bank-notes - (1) Whoever makes, or causes to be made, or uses for any purpose whatsoever, or delivers to any person, any document purporting to be, or in any way resembling, or so nearly resembling as to be calculated to deceive, any currency-note or bank-note shall be punished with fine which may extend to one hundred rupees. (2) If any person, whose name appears on a document the making of which is an offence under sub-section (1), refuses, without lawful excuse, to disclose to a police officer on being so required the name and address of the person by whom it was printed or otherwise made, he shall be punished with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees. (3) Where the name of any person appears on any document in respect of which any person is charged with an offence under sub-section (1) or on any other document used or distributed in connection with that d

Section 489D IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 489D IPC in Hindi and English Section 489D of IPC 1860:- Making or possessing instruments or materials for forging or counterfeiting currency - Whoever, makes, or performs, any part of the process of making, or buys or sells or disposes of, or has in his possession, any machinery, instrument or material for the purpose of being used, or knowing or having reason to believe that it is intended to be used, for forging or counterfeiting any currency note or bank-note, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 489D of Indian Penal Code 1860: G. V. Ramanaiah vs The Superintendent Of Central on 10 October, 1973 Union Of India vs V. Sriharan @ ,Murugan & Ors on 2 December, 2015 K. Hashim vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 17 November, 2004 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 489 घ का विवरण

Section 489C IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 489C IPC in Hindi and English Section 489C of IPC 1860:- Possession of forged or counterfeit currency-notes or bank-notes - Whoever has in his possession any forged or counterfeit currency-note or banknote, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be forged or counterfeit and intending to use the same as genuine or that it may be used as genuine, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 489C of Indian Penal Code 1860: Umashanker vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 5 October, 2001 Umashankar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 5 October, 2001 Dipakbhai Jagdishchndra Patel vs The State Of Gujarat on 24 April, 2019 State Of Kerala vs Mathal Verghese & Ors on 19 November, 1986 K. Hashim vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 17 November, 2004 Mehboob Ali & Anr vs State Of Rajasthan on 27 October, 2015 State Of Maharashtra vs Mrs. Bh

Section 489B IPC in Hindi and English

 Section 489B IPC in Hindi and English Section 489B of IPC 1860:- Using as genuine, forged or counterfeit currency-notes or bank-notes - Whoever, sells to, or buys or receives from, any other person, or otherwise traffics in or uses as genuine, any forged or counterfeit currency-note or bank-note, knowing or having reason to believe the same to be forged or counterfeit, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 489B of Indian Penal Code 1860: Umashankar vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 5 October, 2001 Umashanker vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 5 October, 2001 Dipakbhai Jagdishchndra Patel vs The State Of Gujarat on 24 April, 2019 State Of Maharashtra vs Mrs. Bharati Chandmal Varma @ on 4 December, 2001 Mehboob Ali & Anr vs State Of Rajasthan on 27 October, 2015 Samir Mustafabhai Bajariya vs State

Section 489A IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 489A IPC in Hindi and English Section 489A of IPC 1860:- Counterfeiting currency-notes or bank-notes - Whoever counterfeits, or knowingly performs any part of the process of counterfeiting, any currency-note or banknote, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term, which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. Explanation - For the purposes of this section and of sections 489B, 489C, 489D and 489E, the expression “bank-note” means a promissory note or engagement for the payment of money to bearer on demand issued by any person carrying on the business of banking in any part of the world, or issued by or under the authority of any State or Sovereign Power, and intended to be used as equivalent to, or as a substitute for money. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 489A of Indian Penal Code 1860: State Of Kerala vs Mathal Verghese & Ors on 19 November, 1986 G. V.

Section 489 IPC in Hindi and English

 Section 489 IPC in Hindi and English Section 489 of IPC 1860:- Tampering with property mark with intent to cause injury - Whoever removes, destroys, defaces or adds to any property mark, intending or knowing it to be likely that he may thereby cause injury to any person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 489 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Union Of India vs V. Sriharan @ ,Murugan & Ors on 2 December, 2015 Ram Narain Popli vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 14 January, 2003 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 489 का विवरण - क्षति कारित करने के आशय से संपत्ति चिन्ह को बिगाड़ना - जो कोई किसी संपत्ति चिन्ह को, यह आशय रखते हुए, या यह संभाव्य जानते हुए कि वह तद्द्वारा किसी व्यक्ति को क्षति करे, किसी संपत्ति चिन्ह को अपसारित करेगा, नष्ट करेगा, विरूपित करेगा या उसमें कुछ जोड़ेगा, वह दोनों में से किसी भांति के कारावास से

Section 488 IPC in Hindi and English

Section 488 IPC in Hindi and English Section 488 of IPC 1860:-Punishment for making use of any such false mark - Whoever makes use of any such false mark in any manner prohibited by the last foregoing section shall, unless he proves that he acted without intent to defraud, be punished as if he had committed an offence against that section.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 488 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Swiss Timing Ltd vs Organizing Committee on 28 May, 2014 Union Of India And Another vs W.N. Chadha on 17 December, 1992 Sesamma Phillip vs P. Phillip & Etc on 18 January, 1973 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 488 का विवरण - किसी ऐसे मिथ्या चिन्ह को उपयोग में लाने के लिए दण्ड - जो कोई अंतिम पूर्वगामी धारा द्वारा प्रतिषिद्ध किसी प्रकार से किसी ऐसे मिथ्या चिन्ह का उपयोग करेगा, जब तक कि वह यह साबित न कर दे कि उसने वह कार्य कपट करने के आशय के बिना किया है, वह उसी प्रकार दण्डित किया जाएगा, मानो उसने उस धारा के विरुद्ध अपराध किया हो। To dow

Section 487 IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 487 IPC in Hindi and English Section 487 of IPC 1860:- Making a false mark upon any receptacle containing goods - Whoever makes any false mark upon any case, package or other receptacle containing goods, in a manner reasonably calculated to cause any public servant or any other person to believe that such receptacle contains goods which it does not contain or that it does not contain goods which it does contain, or that the goods contained in such receptacle are of a nature or quality different from the real nature or quality thereof, shall, unless he proves that he acted without intent to defraud, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 487 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Madan Mohan Lal vs State Of Punjab on 1 April, 1970 Krishna Govind Patil vs The State Of Maharashtra on 18 July, 1972 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की

Section 486 IPC in Hindi and English

 Section 486 IPC in Hindi and English Section 486 of IPC 1860:-Selling goods marked with a counterfeit property mark - Whoever sells, or exposes, or has in possession for sale, any goods or things with a counterfeit property mark] affixed to or impressed upon the same or to or upon any case, package or other receptacle in which such goods are contained, shall, unless he proves (a) that, having taken all reasonable precautions against committing an offence against this section, he had at the time of the commission of the alleged offence no reason to suspect the genuineness of the mark, and (b) that, on demand made by or on behalf of the prosecutor, he gave all the information in his power with respect to the persons from whom he obtained such goods or things, or (c) that otherwise he had acted innocently, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.  Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Relate

Section 485 IPC in Hindi and English

 Section 485 IPC in Hindi and English Section 485 of IPC 1860:- Making or possession of any instrument for counterfeiting a property mark - Whoever makes or has in his possession any die, plate or other instrument for the purpose of counterfeiting a property mark, or has in his possession a property mark for the purpose of denoting that any goods belong to a person to whom they do not belong, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 485 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Dau Dayal vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 24 November, 1958 Arunachalam vs P. S. R. Sadhanantham on 6 March, 1979 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 485 का विवरण - संपत्ति चिन्ह के कूटकरण के लिए कोई उपकरण बनाना या उस पर कब्जा - जो कोई संपत्ति चिन्ह के कूटकरण के प्रयोजन से कोई डाई, पट्टी या अन्य उपकरण बनाएगा या अपने कब्जे में रखेगा, अथवा यह द्योतन करने के प्रयो

Section 484 IPC in Hindi and English

 Section 484 IPC in Hindi and English Section 484 of IPC 1860:- Counterfeiting a mark used by a public servant - Whoever counterfeits any property mark used by a public servant, or any mark used by a public servant to denote that any property has been manufactured by a particular person or at a particular time or place, or that the property is of a particular quality or has passed through a particular office, or that it is entitled to any exemption, or uses as genuine any such mark knowing the same to be counterfeit, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 484 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Suresh vs State Of U.P on 17 March, 1981 State Of Karnataka vs K.H. Annegowda & Anr on 8 December, 1976 Y. Abraham Ajith & Ors vs Inspector Of Police, Chennai & Anr on 17 August, 2004 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धार

Section 483 IPC in Hindi and English

  Section 483 IPC in Hindi and English Section 483 of IPC 1860:- Counterfeiting a property mark used by another - Whoever counterfeits any property mark used by any other person shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 483 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Krishnan & Anr vs Krishnaveni & Anr on 24 January, 1997 Dau Dayal vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 24 November, 1958 Rajathi vs C. Ganesan on 22 July, 1999 आईपीसी, 1860 (भारतीय दंड संहिता) की धारा 483 का विवरण -अन्य व्यक्ति द्वारा उपयोग में लाए गए संपत्ति चिन्ह का कूटकरण - जो कोई किसी सम्पत्ति चिन्ह का, जो किसी अन्य व्यक्ति द्वारा उपयोग में लाया जाता हो, कूटकरण करेगा, वह दोनों में से किसी भाँति के कारावास से, जिसकी अवधि दो वर्ष तक हो सकेगी, या जुर्माने से, या दोनों से, दण्डित किया जाएगा। To download this dhara of IPC in pdf format use chrome web browser and use keys [Ctrl +

Section 482 IPC in Hindi and English

Section 482 IPC in Hindi and English Section 482 of IPC 1860:- Punishment for using a false property mark - Whoever uses any false property mark shall, unless he proves that he acted without intent to defraud, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both. Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 482 of Indian Penal Code 1860: Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012 Amit Kapoor vs Ramesh Chander & Anr on 13 September, 2012 Pratibha vs Rameshwari Devi & Ors on 17 September, 2007 Narinder Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 27 March, 1947 Pratibha vs Rameshwari Devi & Ors on 17 September, 2007 Narinder Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 27 March, 2014 State Rep. By D.S.P., vs K.V. Rajendran & Ors on 2 September, 2008 Krishnan & Anr vs Krishnaveni & Anr on 24 January, 1997 Punjab State Warehousing vs M/S Sh.Durga