The Chairman, SEBI vs Shriram Mutual Fund Case

 The Chairman, SEBI vs Shriram Mutual Fund - Important Supreme Court Cases 2006

On 23rd May, 2006, a two Judges Bench in The Chairman, SEBI vs Shriram Mutual Fund & Anr. [Civil Appeal No.9523-9524 of 2003] considered the question as to whether once a Mutual Fund violates the terms of Certificate of Registration (which are statutory in nature, as prescribed by Section 15(D)(b) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992) and the statutory Regulations i.e. SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996, the imposition of penalty becomes a sine qua non of the violation. The Bench held that “penalty is attracted as soon as contravention of the statutory obligation as contemplated by the Act and the Regulation is established” and that “intention of the parties committing such violation” i.e. mens rea was wholly irrelevant.

The Bench held that the impugned judgment of the Securities Appellate Tribunal had “set the stage for various market players to violate statutory regulations with impunity and subsequently plead ignorance of law or lack of mens rea to escape the imposition of penalty.” It held that “imputing mens rea into the provisions of Chapter VI-A of the Act is against the plain language of the statute and frustrates entire purpose and object of introducing Chapter VIA to give teeth to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to secure strict compliance of the Act and the Regulations”.


Landmark Cases of India

Comments

  1. The post you wrote and shared with us is amazing. I learned some unique and valuable information from your essay. Mutual Funds Security Bank Thank you for providing us with this post

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

100 Questions on Indian Constitution for UPSC 2020 Pre Exam

भारतीय संविधान से संबंधित 100 महत्वपूर्ण प्रश्न उतर

संविधान की प्रमुख विशेषताओं का उल्लेख | Characteristics of the Constitution of India