Section 25M The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
Section 25M The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947:
Prohibition of lay- off.-
(1) No workman (other than a badli workman or a casual workman) whose name is borne on the muster rolls of an industrial establishment to which this Chapter applies shall be laid- off by his employer except 1 with the prior permission of the appropriate Government or such authority as may be specified by that Government by notification in the Official Gazette (hereinafter in this section referred to as the specified authority), obtained on an application made in this behalf, unless such lay- off is due to shortage of power or to natural calamity, and in the case of a mine, such lay- off is due also to fire, flood, excess of inflammable gas or explosion].
(2) 1 An application for permission under sub- section (1) shall be made by the employer in the prescribed manner stating clearly the reasons for the intended lay- off and a copy of such application shall also be served simultaneously on the workmen concerned in the prescribed manner.
(3) Where the workman (other than badli workmen or casual workmen) of an industrial establishment, being a mine, have been laid- off under sub- section (1) for reasons of fire, flood or excess of inflammable gas or explosion, the employer, in relation to such establishment, shall, within a period of thirty days from the date of commencement of such lay- off, apply, in the prescribed manner, to the appropriate Government or the specified authority for permission to continue the lay- off.
(4) Where an application for permission under sub- section (1) or sub- section (3) has been made, the appropriate Government or the specified authority, after making such enquiry as it thinks fit and after giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the employer, the workmen concerned and the persons interested in such lay- off, may, having regard to the genuineness and adequacy of the reasons for such lay- off, the interests of the workmen and all other relevant factors, by order and for reasons to be recorded in writing, grant or refuse to grant such permission and a copy of such order shall be communicated to the employer and the workmen.
(5) Where an application for permission under sub- section (1) or sub- section (3) has been made and the appropriate Government or the specified authority does not communicate the order granting or refusing to grant permission to the employer within a period of sixty days from the date on which such application is made, the permission applied for shall be deemed to have been granted on the expiration of the said period of sixty days.
(6) An order of the appropriate Government or the specified authority granting or refusing to grant permission shall, subject to the provisions of sub- section (7), be final and binding on all the parties concerned and shall remain in force for one year from the date of such order.
(7) The appropriate Government or the specified authority may, either on its own motion or on the application made by the employer or any workman, review its order granting or refusing to grant permission under sub- section (4) or refer the matter or, as the case may be, cause it to be referred, to a Tribunal for adjudication: Provided that where a reference has been made to a Tribunal under this sub- section, it shall pass an award within a period of thirty days from the date of such reference.
(8) Where no application for permission under sub- section (1) is made, or where no application for permission under sub- section (3) is made within the period specified therein, or where the permission for any lay- off has been refused, such lay- off shall be deemed to be illegal from the date on which the workmen had been laid- off and the workmen shall be entitled to all the benefits under any law for the time being in force as if they had not been laid- off.
(9) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this section, the appropriate Government may, if it is satisfied that owing to such exceptional circumstances as accident in the establishment or death of the employer or the like, it is necessary so to do, by order, direct that the provisions of sub- section (1), or, as the case may be, sub- section (3) shall not apply in relation to such establishment for such period as may be specified in the order.
(10) 1 ] The provisions of section 25C (other than the second proviso thereto) shall apply to cases of lay- off referred to in this section. Explanation.-- For the purposes of this section, a workman shall not be deemed to be laid- off by an employer if such employer offers any alternative employment (which in the opinion of the employer does not call for any special skill or previous experience and can be done by the workman) in the same establishment from which he has been laid- off or in any other establishment belonging to the same employer, situate in the same town or village, or situate within such distance from the establishment to which he belongs that the transfer will not involve undue hardship to the workman having regard to the facts and circumstances of his case, provided that the wages which would normally have been paid to the workman are offered for the alternative appointment also.
Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Leading Case Law Related to Section 25M The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947:
The Papnasam Labour Union vs Madura Coats Ltd. And Anr on 8 December, 1994
Papnasam Labour Union vs Madura Coats Ltd on 8 December, 1994
Ashok Kumar Jain And Others vs The State Of Bihar And Others on 8 December, 1994
Ashok Kumar Jain vs State Of Bihar on 8 December, 1994
Workmen Of Meenakshi Mills Ltd. vs Meenakshi Mills Ltd. And Anr. Etc. on 15 May, 1992
Bhavesh D. Parish & Others vs Union Of India And Another on 12 May, 2000
M/S. Empire Industries Ltd vs State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 17 March, 2010
Harjinder Singh vs Punjab State Warehousing Corp on 5 January, 2010
औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 की धारा 25ठ का विवरण -
परिभाषाएं-इस अध्याय के प्रयोजनों के लिए-
(क) “औद्योगिक स्थापन" से अभिप्रेत है-
(i) कारखाना अधिनियम, 1948 (1948 का 63) की धारा 2 के खंड (ड) में यथापरिभाषिक कारखाना;
(ii) खान अधिनियम, 1952 (1952 का 35) की धारा 2 की उपधारा (1) के खंड (ञ) में यथापरिभाषित खान; अथवा
(iii)) बागान श्रम अधिनियम, 1951 (1951 का 69) की धारा 2 के खंड (च) में यथापरिभाषित बागान;
(ख) धारा 2 के खंड (क) के उपखंड (ii) में किसी बात के होते हुए भी, -
(i) किसी ऐसी कम्पनी के सम्बन्ध में, जिसकी समादत्त शेयर पूंजी का कम से कम इक्यावन प्रतिशत केन्द्रीय सरकार द्वारा धृत है, अथवा
(ii) किसी ऐसे निगम के संबंध में [जो धारा 2 के खंड (क) के उपखंड (i) में निर्दिष्ट निगम नहीं हैट जो संसद् द्वारा बनाई गई किसी संधि के द्वारा या अधीन स्थापित किया गया है,
केन्द्रीय सरकार समुचित सरकार होगी ।
To download this dhara / Section of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in pdf format use chrome web browser and use keys [Ctrl + P] and save as pdf.
Post a Comment