Section 25FF The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

 

Section 25FF The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947


Compensation to workmen in case of transfer of undertakings.- Where the ownership or management of an undertaking is transferred, whether by agreement or by operation of law, from the employer in relation to that undertaking to a new employer, every workman who has been in continuous service for not less than one year in that undertaking immediately before such transfer shall be entitled to notice and compensation in accordance with the provisions of section 25F, as if the workman had been retrenched: Provided that nothing in this section shall apply to a workman in any case where there has been a change of employers by reason of the transfer, if--

(a) the service of the workman has not been interrupted by such transfer;

(b) the terms and conditions of service applicable to the workman after such transfer are not in any way less favourable to the workman than those applicable to him immediately before the transfer; and

(c) the new employer is, under the terms of such transfer or otherwise, legally liable to pay to the workman, in the event of his retrenchment, compensation on the basis that his service has been continuous and has not been interrupted by the transfer.


Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Leading Case Law Related to Section 25FF The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947: 

Management, Mettur Beardsell Ltd vs Workmen Of Mettur Beardsell Ltd. & on 26 April, 2006

Management Of R.S. Madhoramand vs Its Workmen on 14 November, 1963

Anakapalla Co-Operative  vs Workmen on 23 October, 1962

Board Of Directors Of The South  vs N.K. Mohammad Khan, Etc on 25 November, 1968

Workmen Of Subong Tea Estate vs The Outgoing Management Of  on 2 December, 1963

Gurmail Singh And Ors. Etc. Etc vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 25 October, 1990

N.T.C. (South Maharashtra) vs Rashtriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh And  on 24 November, 1992

M/S Maruti Udyog Ltd vs Ram Lal & Ors on 25 January, 2005

Payment Of Wages Inspector vs Surajmal Mehta & Anr on 3 December, 1968

Punjab Land Development vs Presiding Officer, Labour  on 4 May, 1990



औद्योगिक विवाद अधिनियम, 1947 की धारा 25 चच का विवरण - 

 उपक्रमों के अन्तरण की दशा में कर्मकारों को प्रतिकर-जहां कि किसी उपक्रम के स्वामित्व या प्रबन्ध उस उपक्रम से सम्बद्ध नियोजक से किसी नए नियोजक को करार द्वारा या विधि की क्रिया द्वारा अन्तरित किया जाता है वहां हर कर्मकार, जो ऐसे अन्तरण से ठीक पहले उस उपक्रम में कम से कम एक वर्ष के लिए निरन्तर सेवा में रह चुका है धारा 25च के उपबन्धों के अनुसार सूचना तथा प्रतिकर का वैसे ही हकदार होगा मानो उस कर्मकार की छंटनी की गई होः

परन्तु इस धारा की कोई भी बात, उस दशा में जिसमें कि अन्तरण के कारण नियोजक बदल गए हों, तब लागू नहीं होगी जबकि-

(क) ऐसे अन्तरण से कर्मकार की सेवा में विच्छेद न हुआ हो,

(ख) ऐसे अन्तरण के पश्चात् कर्मकार को लागू सेवा के निबन्धन और शर्तें कर्मकार के लिए किसी भी प्रकार उन निबन्धनों और शर्तों से कम अनुकूल न हों जो अन्तरण से ठीक पहले उसे लागू थीं, तथा

(ग) नया नियोजक कर्मकार को, उसकी छंटनी की दशा में, इस आधार पर कि उसकी सेवा निरन्तर चलती रही है और अन्तरण द्वारा वह विच्छिन्न नहीं हुई है, ऐसे अन्तरण के निबन्धनों के अधीन अथवा अन्यथा, प्रतिकर देने के लिए वैध रूप से दायी हो ।


To download this dhara / Section of  The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 in pdf format use chrome web browser and use keys [Ctrl + P] and save as pdf.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

संविधान की प्रमुख विशेषताओं का उल्लेख | Characteristics of the Constitution of India

100 Questions on Indian Constitution for UPSC 2020 Pre Exam

भारतीय संविधान से संबंधित 100 महत्वपूर्ण प्रश्न उतर