Section 28 Indian Evidence Act 1872


Section 28 Indian Evidence Act 1872 in Hindi and English 

Section 28 Evidence Act 1872 :Confession made after removal of impression caused by inducement, threat or promise, relevant -- If such a confession as is referred to in section 24 is made after the impression caused by any such inducement, threat or promise has, in the opinion of the Court, been fully removed, it is relevant.

Supreme Court of India Important Judgments And Case Law Related to Section 28 Indian Evidence Act 1872:

A. S. Krishna vs State Of, Madras.(With Connected on 28 November, 1956

K. Hashim vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 17 November, 2004

The State Of Punjab vs Sodhi Sukhdev Singh on 15 November, 1960

Excise Commissioner. U.P. vs Ram Kumar on 5 May, 1976

Atyam Veerraju And Others vs Pechetti Venkanna And Others on 20 September, 1965

Dagdu & Others Etc vs State Of Maharashtra on 19 April, 1977

Jagdish Prasad Patel(D) Thr. Lrs. vs Shivnath on 9 April, 2019

Federation Of Obstetrics And vs Union Of India on 3 May, 2019

S.P. Gupta vs President Of India And Ors. on 30 December, 1981

Anglo American Metallurgical vs Mmtc Ltd. on 17 December, 2020

भारतीय साक्ष्य अधिनियम, 1872 की धारा 28 का विवरण :  -  उत्प्रेरणा, धमकी या वचन से पैदा हए मन पर प्रभाव के दूर हो जाने के पश्चात् की गई संस्वीकृति सुसंगत है -- यदि ऐसी कोई संस्वीकृति, जैसी धारा 24 में निर्दिष्ट है, न्यायालय की राय में उसके मन पर प्रभाव के, जो ऐसी किसी उत्प्रेरणा, धमकी या वचन से कारित हुआ है, पूर्णतः दूर हो जाने के पश्चात् की गई है, तो वह सुसंगत है।

To download this dhara / Section of Indian Evidence Act in pdf format use chrome web browser and use keys [Ctrl + P] and save as pdf.


Popular posts from this blog

100 Questions on Indian Constitution for UPSC 2020 Pre Exam

भारतीय संविधान से संबंधित 100 महत्वपूर्ण प्रश्न उतर

संविधान की प्रमुख विशेषताओं का उल्लेख | Characteristics of the Constitution of India