Posts

K. Ramya & Ors. VERSUS National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr

Image
K. Ramya & Ors.  VERSUS National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr Landmark Cases  of India /  सुप्रीम कोर्ट के ऐतिहासिक फैसले REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.7046 OF 2022 [Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 31931 of 2017] K. Ramya & Ors. … Appellant(s)                                              VERSUS National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr. … Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Surya Kant, J. 1. Leave Granted. 2. The   present   appeal   is   directed   against   the   judgment   dated 30.06.2017   passed   by   the   High   Court   of   Judicature   at   Madras, Madurai   Bench   whereby   the   appeal   preferred   by   the   National Insurance   Co.   Ltd.   (Respondent   No.1;   hereinafter,   “Insurance Company”)   against   the   award   dated   06.10.2012   passed   by   Motor Vehicle   Accident   Claims   Tribunal,   Tiruchirappalli   (hereinafter, “Tribunal”) was allowed and the compensation granted to Apellants wa

KAZI MOINUDDIN KAZI BASHIRODDIN & ORS. VERSUS THE MAHARASHTRA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Image
KAZI MOINUDDIN KAZI BASHIRODDIN & ORS. VERSUS THE MAHARASHTRA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Landmark Cases  of India /  सुप्रीम कोर्ट के ऐतिहासिक फैसले REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA  CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7062 OF 2022 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO. 1939 OF 2019) KAZI MOINUDDIN KAZI BASHIRODDIN & ORS. ………APPELLANT(S)  VERSUS THE MAHARASHTRA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, THROUGH ITS SENIOR REGIONAL MANAGER REGIONAL OFFICE, MTDC, AURANGABAD, MAHARASHTRA & ANR. …...…RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT DINESH MAHESHWARI, J. Leave granted. 2. The appellants herein are respondents in First Appeal No. 1673 of 2017 (First Appeal St. No. 37304 of 2016) pending in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad. They have preferred this appeal for being aggrieved of the order dated 03.12.2018, as passed in Civil Application No. 7037 of 2018 moved in the said appeal, whereby the High Court has allowed the applicant-Maharashtra Tourism Developm

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (R AND B) AND OTHERS VERSUS GOKUL CHANDRA KANUNGO (DEAD) THR. HIS LRS.

Image
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (R AND B)  AND OTHERS VERSUS GOKUL CHANDRA KANUNGO (DEAD)  THR. HIS LRS. Landmark Cases  of India /  सुप्रीम कोर्ट के ऐतिहासिक फैसले REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION  CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8990 OF 2017 EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (R AND B)  AND OTHERS           ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS GOKUL CHANDRA KANUNGO (DEAD)  THR. HIS LRS. ...RESPONDENT(S) J U D G M E N T B.R. GAVAI, J. 1. The appellants have challenged the judgment dated 18th  April 2012 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Orissa in Arbitration Appeal No. 25 of 2007, thereby dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants. 2. The facts in brief giving rise to the present appeal are as under: The   respondent   was   awarded   the   contract   for construction   of   3   kilometers   missing   link   on   NH­6   from Kanjipani to Kuntala on 16th December 1971.  The work was to be completed within one year that is before 15th December 1972.   The contract amount was

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS VERSUS MR. ASPI CHINOY AND ANOTHER

Image
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS VERSUS MR. ASPI CHINOY AND ANOTHER  Landmark Cases  of India /  सुप्रीम कोर्ट के ऐतिहासिक फैसले 1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5809 OF 2011 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MR. ASPI CHINOY AND ANOTHER ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. OF 2022 (Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 26906-26911 of 2011) J U D G M E N T B.R. GAVAI, J. 1. Delay condoned and leave granted in SLP(C) Nos. 26906-26911 of 2011. 2. By way of the present appeals, the State has assailed the judgment and order dated 29th September 2009 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Writ Petition No. 713 of 2001, thereby allowing the writ petition filed by the respondents. 2 3. The respondents-original writ petitioners had filed the writ petition challenging the letter dated 27th June 2000 addressed by the Collector to the Sub-Registrar, Bombay City, Old Custom House